· irc security tor onions openbsd pf hambsd

From socket(2) to .onion with pf(4)

I’ve been rebuilding my IRC bouncer setup and as part of this process I’ve decided to connect to IRC via onion services where possible. This setup isn’t intended to provide anonymity as once I’m connected I’m going to identify to NickServ anyway. I guess it provides a little protection in that my IP address shouldn’t be visible in that gap between connection and a cloak activating, but there’s so many other ways that my identity could leak.

You might wonder why I even bothered if not for anonymity. There are two reasons:

  1. to learn more about tor(1) and pf(4), and
  2. to figure out how to get non-proxy aware software to talk to onion services.

I often would find examples of socat, torsocks, etc. but none of them seemed to fit with my goal of wanting to use an onion service as if it were just another host on the Internet. By this I mean, with a socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM) that didn’t also affect my ability to connect to other Internet hosts.

Onion services don’t have IP addresses. They have names that look like DNS names but that are not actually in DNS. So the first problem here is going to be that we’re not going to be able to give an onion address to the kernel, it wants an IP address. In my setup I chose as a subnet that will have IP addresses that when connected to, will actually connect to onion services.

In the torrc file you can use MapAddress to encode these mappings, for example:

MapAddress ajnvpgl6prmkb7yktvue6im5wiedlz2w32uhcwaamdiecdrfpwwgnlqd.onion # Freenode
MapAddress dtlbunzs5b7s5sl775quwezleyeplxzicdoh3cnhm7feolxmkfd42nqd.onion # Hackint
MapAddress awwqg2ishrohngue.onion # 2600net - broken(?)
MapAddress darksci3bfoka7tw.onion # darkscience
MapAddress akeyxc6hie26nlfylwiuyuf3a4tdwt4os7wiz3fsafijpvbgrkrzx2qd.onion # Indymedia

Now when tor(1) is asked to connect to it will map this to the address of Freenode’s onion service, and connect to that instead. The next part of the problem is allowing tor(1) to receive these requests from a non-proxy aware application, in my case ZNC. This setup will also need a network interface to act as the interface to tor(1). A loopback interface will suffice and it’s not necessary to add an IP address to it:

# ifconfig lo1 up

pf is a firewall for OpenBSD, that can also perform some other related functions. One such function is called divert-to. Unfortunately, there is also divert-packet which is completely unrelated. tor(1) supports receiving packets that have been processed by a divert-to rule and this is often used for routing all traffic from a network through the Tor network. This arrangement is known as a “transparent proxy” because the application is unaware that anything is going on.

In my setup, I’m only routing traffic for specific onion services via the Tor network, but the same concepts are used.

In the torrc:

TransProxyType pf-divert

In pf.conf(5):

pass in quick on lo1 inet proto tcp all divert-to port 1338
pass out inet proto tcp to route-to lo1

and that’s it! I’m now able to connect to from ZNC and pf will divert the traffic to tor.

On names and TLS certificates: I’m using TLS to connect to the onion services, but I’m not validating the certificates. I’ve already verified the server identities because they have the key for the onion service, the reason I’m using TLS is because I’m then presenting a client certificate to the servers (CertFP) to log in to NickServ. The TLS is there for the server’s benefit while the onion service authentication is for my benefit. You could add entries to your /etc/hosts file with mappings from irc.freenode.org to but it seemed like a bit of a fragile arrangement. If pf or tor stop functioning currently, then no connection is made, but if the /etc/hosts file were to be rewritten, you’d then connect over the Internet and you’ve disabled TLS verification because you’re relying on the onion service to do that, which you’re not using.

On types of tranparent proxy: There are a few different types of transparent proxy supported by tor. pf-divert seemed like the most appropriate one to use in my case. It’s possible that the natd(8) “protocol” referred to in the NATDPort torrc option is actually talking about divert(4) sockets which are supported in OpenBSD, and that’s another option, but it’s not clear which would be the preferred way to do it. If I had more time I’d dig into which methods are useful and which are redundant as removing code is often a good thing to do.

If you would like to contact me with comments, please send me an email.
If you would like to support my free software work, you can support me on Patreon or donate via PayPal.

This post was syndicated on:

Articles from my friends' blogs

Splat for UHF radio station coverage modelling

I’ve been talking to Iain, MM0ROR a bit on the radio. After I persuaded him to build a 70cm version of the 1/4 wave vertical antenna I built earlier this year, I helped him test it on the radio tonight from my new /m setup. Initially I drove to the picture…

via Blogs on Foxk.it July 6, 2020

Blog more in 2020

In June I tried to write 4 blog posts and I elicited help from some of my friends to do this. I managed to write 5 posts beyond the announcement I would blog: Capturing a screen sub section with ffmpeg FreeBSD on the Intel 10th Gen i3 NUC Command Line Bug Hunt…

via Adventures July 2, 2020

A note on Tiktok and Pride

This is not part of [tj]'s June blogging drive. I am just angry. It …

via Alfie, online - blog June 29, 2020

Generated by openring

Share Me